How the web destroys the quality of students research papers summary

He says that World Wide Web provides an opportunity for students to reflect on topics that are relevant to their academic success including the nature of critical thinking, information against knowledge, plagiarism and locating evaluating and documenting library and web sources.

They add unattributed quotations and only the information that are available on the net. Students get many references when they search for sources, but most of them are not important and relevant.

Did I ask worse questions? We read what others have written to understand ourselves better and to learn different points of view. I need to help my students understand to let the machine do their work for them.

When college libraries are diverting funds from books to computer technology that will be obsolete in two years at most, they send a clear message to students: I take much of spelling and grammar now standard features on the blame for the decline in quality of student most computers, one wonders why students research in my classes.

How to write a research summary and what's the model of a research summary?

Using the Web as a metaphor, Cummins says that it us up to the student to become either the spider or the fly. However, the web technology has had a negative effect on quality of research papers written by students.

Students do not include credible and valid references when writing their research papers.

This section is extremely important to help you make connections between reading and writing. The aim is to classify features, to count them, and to construct statistics in an attempt to explain your observations. Engineers should be creative, inquisitive, analytical, and detail oriented.

Fourth, inadequate training on how to evaluate sources and write papers has also led to poor quality papers as students do not evaluate sources. I need to teach students how to read, to take time with language and ideas, to work through arguments, to synthesize disparate sources to come up with original thought.

Discuss a point that either Rothenburg or Cummins makes about the relative value of library and Internet sources for writing a research paper.

Rothenberg’s Criticisms of Using the Web for Research

Include at least one direct quotation from the reading as you support your opinion. Work to answer each question concisely, but with high information density.

The placelessness of the Web leads to an ethereal randomness of thought. Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it? Www is a recent arrival as a source. My class had the subject of the paper, the kind of analysis that fallen victim to the latest easy way of writing a requires a book, rather than an article, for its full paper: Students do not include credible and valid references when writing their research papers.

They have to seek improvement and work hard. What happens to the many students some things never change who scramble to write a paper the night before it's due? Gone are the pathways of logic and passion, the sense of the progress of an argument.

Cut and pasted thousand might actually help you. First, the quality of research papers submitted by students has declined as students have become victims of the latest method of writing research papers as they research papers on the web.

What is a quality student? Now they are seen as centers Technology. Search Engines, with their half-baked Another clue is the beautiful pictures algorithms, are closer to slot machines than to and graphs that are inserted into the body of the library catalogues.

David Rothenberg describes student papers that rely on Internet research: Of course, you can't blame the students for ignoring books. First, the bibliography cites no books, just articles or pointers to places in that virtual land somewhere off any map: The web is responsible for the decline in quality of research papers by providing outdated and irrelevant information.

What had happened since last fall? Knowledge does not emerge in a vacuum, but we do need silence and space for sustained thought. Now I will look to see if any of them have written the assignment and how long their entry is.

Don't get me wrong, I'm no neo-Luddite.Summary and response. David Rothenberg examines how the web destroys the quality of research papers completed by students.

Technology development has changed how students read and complete their assignments. How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students’ Research Papers Point of View by David Rothenberg Sometimes I look forward to the end-of- semester rush, when students’ final papers come streaming into my office and mailbox.

I could have hundreds of pages of original thought to read and evaluate. How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students’ Research Papers Point of View by David Rothenberg Sometimes I look forward to the end-of- semester rush, when students’ final papers come.

In How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students’ Research Papers, David Rothenberg laments the use of the Web as a tool for doing research and asserts that it has lowered the quality of their.

Your instructions: Write an eJournal for David Rothenburg's "How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students' Research Papers" and Richard Cummins' "An Opposing View" by. Comparative Summary Summary: In this essay “How the Web Destroy the Quality of Students’ Research papers” David Rothenberg () complains that web has destroyed the quality of students.

Download
How the web destroys the quality of students research papers summary
Rated 5/5 based on 44 review