An archaeological examination of home bases and early hominids

In general, no surprises emerged from the new work. Paleolithic archaeologists have drawn an analogy between modern day hunter-gathers and the remains from humans of earlier times. He says that the home base interpretation depends primarily on faunal evidence. These flakes seamed to be used but not intentionally made to be used.

Archaeology/ Home Bases And Early Hominids term paper 18605

If these artifacts did get there from hominids they need to assess what kind of activities took place there. What is presented is a general model based mainly on analogies with primate behaviour and sociality.

Recent evidence suggests these dispersals are closely related to fluctuating periods of climate change. Osteological comparisons thus suggest that carnivores were primarily the reason for the one bone and the others were from a different bone-collector, these were the original ones thought to be used by hominids Potts, However others say that hunter-gathers eat their food while foraging and the extent of food sharing at these campsites is unclear, but it is known that in modern hunter-gathering societies at least some food exchange takes place.

Thing bring us to the third possibility of active carnivores. Potts explains that according to this view the origin of home bases correspond with an increase in the dependence of infants on social care and with cultural learning in hominid social groups. It becomes more difficult as the archaeologist attempts to define his views of what our predecessors viewed as liminal space and identity in their contrasting surroundings.

They cannot explain the volume of incomplete and complete cores, and large, sharp flakes so visibly in abundance at a great number of sites. This very loose definition of landscape archaeology, therefore, permits the contrasting interpretations of the inter-relations between the artifactual remains and the land on which they were imposed.

The thought of this interpretation of the archaeological sites from Olduvai and others has been extremely attractive for two major reasons. Schick defines a site "as a place where stone import rates exceeded exports" Schick All of these, in turn, reflect and influence communication, and also have meaning.

The second reason is that home base interpretation in accurate with other prominent ideas of human evolution. Provided that these sites were visited regularly enough on the hunting-foraging rounds, a substantial, accentuated development of stone deposition density would occur through a circular feedback mechanism Schick Plausible reasons why this could have transpired include: The prediction made is that transport of stone and the carcass bones will be minimised by endeavouring to seek the nearest natural or artificial source of stone raw materials or stone tools, and the transport of some of the tools and all of the carcass parts to the nearest facet which would offer relative safety.

He says that the home base interpretation depends primarily on faunal evidence.Chapter 8 – Plio-Pleistocene Hominins and the Genus Homo 1. When were the first stone tools made?

Archaeological sites at which there is evidence that early hominids were obtaining the raw scavenging sites b.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

quarrying sites c. home base sites d. gathering sites 6. T/F Hunting and root extraction are relatively simple processes that. Study 31 Archaeology Terms (Exam 2) flashcards from rsidna s. on StudyBlue.

Concentrations of stone and bone were places that hominids were storing the raw materials to make stone tools worked with the Leakys - thought sites like FxJj50 and DK represent home bases – similar to modern hunter gatherer camps (The Home Base hypothesis.

Early Hominids Essay Examples. 5 total results. The Life and Homes of the Early Hominids in Home Bases and Early Hominids.

Home bases and Early hominids Essay

2, words. 6 pages. An Analysis of the Evolution of Bipedalism for the Early Hominids. words. 1 page. An Archaeological Examination of Home Bases and Early Hominids. 2, words.

Archaeology/ Paleolithic Home Bases term paper 8131

6. Archaeological sites at which there is evidence that early hominins were obtaining the raw material to make stone tools are referred to as a. scavenging sites b. quarrying sites c. home-base sites d%(18). kya- middle Paleolithic, hominids take off flakes that were same size & shapes and make tools out of the flakes.

Technology associated with archaic forms of Homo sapiens. Archaeological evidence for preferential handedness in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene, and its possible implications. Journal of Human Evolution, –

An archaeological examination of home bases and early hominids
Rated 3/5 based on 85 review